Magene L508 or Sigma RECO 80 LINK: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two bike radars using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Magene L508
Main drawbackDetection range is the main compromise against longer-reaching alternatives
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Sigma RECO 80 LINK
Main drawbackConfirmed seatpost compatibility is limited to round shapes
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Detection range”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 9 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Battery life”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 9 / 10 vs 8.1
- Priority: “Detection angle”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 9.3 / 10 vs 8
- Priority: “Equipment”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 8.3 / 10 vs 7.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Magene L508 | Sigma RECO 80 LINK |
|---|---|---|
| Detection range | 7.4 | 9 advantage |
| Battery life | 8.1 | 9 advantage |
| Detection angle | 8 | 9.3 advantage |
| Equipment | 7.3 | 8.3 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Magene L508 | Sigma RECO 80 LINK |
|---|---|---|
| Detection range | 140 m | 160 m |
| Battery life | 19 h | 30 h |
| Weight | 65 g | Not provided |
| Light output | not disclosed (unverified) | Not provided |
| Detection angle | 40 ° | 60 ° |
| Charging time | Not provided | 3 h |
| Battery capacity | Not provided | 1350 mAh |
| Connectivity | ANT+ | ANT+ |
| Features | Braking detection | Braking detection |
| Ingress protection rating | IPX7 | IP67 |
| Charging connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Mounting location | Seatpost | Seatpost |
Values taken from the specifications table in each analysis; “Not provided”: no value found. “unverified”: among the 5 essential specifications (Detection range, Battery life, Weight, Light output, Detection angle), a value found online that no verified source (archived retailer page or manufacturer documentation) confirms. Other rows are not subject to this check.
Which is right for you?
Magene L508
Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Sigma RECO 80 LINK
Leads on 4 criteria of 4 compared
- Detection range: 9/10 vs 7.4/10 (160 m vs 140 m)
- Detection angle: 9.3/10 vs 8/10 (60 ° vs 40 °)
- Equipment: 8.3/10 vs 7.3/10
- Battery life: 9/10 vs 8.1/10 (30 h vs 19 h)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Magene L508 or Sigma RECO 80 LINK?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK scores 8.9/10, compared with 8/10 for Magene L508, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Detection range”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Detection range”: 9/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Magene L508. Recorded values: 160 m versus 140 m.
Which wins on “Detection angle”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Detection angle”: 9.3/10 compared with 8/10 for Magene L508. Recorded values: 60 ° versus 40 °.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Equipment”: 8.3/10 compared with 7.3/10 for Magene L508.
Which wins on “Battery life”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Battery life”: 9/10 compared with 8.1/10 for Magene L508. Recorded values: 30 h versus 19 h.