Sigma RECO 80 LINK or COOSPO TR70: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two bike radars using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Sigma RECO 80 LINK
Main drawbackConfirmed seatpost compatibility is limited to round shapes
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
COOSPO TR70
Main drawbackDetection range leaves more reach available elsewhere
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Detection range”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 9 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Detection angle”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 9.3 / 10 vs 8
- Priority: “Equipment”COOSPO TR70 8.9 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Sigma RECO 80 LINK | COOSPO TR70 |
|---|---|---|
| Detection range | 9 advantage | 7.4 |
| Battery life | 9 | 9.4 |
| Detection angle | 9.3 advantage | 8 |
| Equipment | 8.3 | 8.9 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Sigma RECO 80 LINK | COOSPO TR70 |
|---|---|---|
| Detection range | 160 m | 140 m |
| Battery life | 30 h | 40 h |
| Weight | Not provided | 63,7 g |
| Light output | Not provided | 70 lm |
| Detection angle | 60 ° | 40 ° |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2 h |
| Battery capacity | 1350 mAh | 1500 mAh |
| Connectivity | ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ |
| Compatible with a smartphone | Android | Android, iOS |
| Lighting modes | Steady | Steady |
| Features | Braking detection | Braking detection |
| Ingress protection rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Charging connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Power supply | Built-in rechargeable battery | Built-in rechargeable battery |
| Mounting location | Seatpost | Seatpost |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK
Leads on 2 criteria of 4 compared
- Detection range: 9/10 vs 7.4/10 (160 m vs 140 m)
- Detection angle: 9.3/10 vs 8/10 (60 ° vs 40 °)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Sigma RECO 80 LINK or COOSPO TR70?
They're neck and neck: 8.9/10 for Sigma RECO 80 LINK, 8.5/10 for COOSPO TR70. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Detection range”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Detection range”: 9/10 compared with 7.4/10 for COOSPO TR70. Recorded values: 160 m versus 140 m.
Which wins on “Detection angle”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Detection angle”: 9.3/10 compared with 8/10 for COOSPO TR70. Recorded values: 60 ° versus 40 °.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
COOSPO TR70 wins on “Equipment”: 8.9/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Sigma RECO 80 LINK.