Sigma RECO 80 LINK or Magicshine SEEMEE R300: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two bike radars using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Sigma RECO 80 LINK
Main drawbackConfirmed seatpost compatibility is limited to round shapes
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Magicshine SEEMEE R300
Main drawbackNarrow detection angle focused behind the bike
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Detection range”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 9 / 10 vs 7.4
- Priority: “Battery life”Magicshine SEEMEE R300 9.5 / 10 vs 9
- Priority: “Detection angle”Sigma RECO 80 LINK 9.3 / 10 vs 6.8
- Priority: “Equipment”Magicshine SEEMEE R300 9.5 / 10 vs 8.3
By criterion
| Criterion | Sigma RECO 80 LINK | Magicshine SEEMEE R300 |
|---|---|---|
| Detection range | 9 advantage | 7.4 |
| Battery life | 9 | 9.5 advantage |
| Detection angle | 9.3 advantage | 6.8 |
| Equipment | 8.3 | 9.5 advantage |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Sigma RECO 80 LINK | Magicshine SEEMEE R300 |
|---|---|---|
| Detection range | 160 m | 140 m |
| Battery life | 30 h | 100 h |
| Light output | Not provided | 300 lm |
| Detection angle | 60 ° | 35 ° |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2,15 h |
| Battery capacity | 1350 mAh | 3350 mAh |
| Connectivity | ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ |
| Lighting modes | Steady | Daytime flashing, Night flash, Peloton, Steady |
| Features | Braking detection | Automatic on/off |
| Ingress protection rating | IP67 | IPX6 |
| Charging connector | USB-C | USB-C |
| Power supply | Built-in rechargeable battery | Built-in rechargeable battery |
| Mounting location | Seatpost | Seatpost |
| Compatible seatpost shape | Round | Round, Aero |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK
Tied, leading on 2 of the 4 criteria compared
- Detection angle: 9.3/10 vs 6.8/10 (60 ° vs 35 °)
- Detection range: 9/10 vs 7.4/10 (160 m vs 140 m)
Magicshine SEEMEE R300
Tied, leading on 2 of the 4 criteria compared
- Equipment: 9.5/10 vs 8.3/10
- Battery life: 9.5/10 vs 9/10 (100 h vs 30 h)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Sigma RECO 80 LINK or Magicshine SEEMEE R300?
They're neck and neck: 8.9/10 for Sigma RECO 80 LINK, 8.5/10 for Magicshine SEEMEE R300. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Detection angle”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Detection angle”: 9.3/10 compared with 6.8/10 for Magicshine SEEMEE R300. Recorded values: 60 ° versus 35 °.
Which wins on “Detection range”?
Sigma RECO 80 LINK wins on “Detection range”: 9/10 compared with 7.4/10 for Magicshine SEEMEE R300. Recorded values: 160 m versus 140 m.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Magicshine SEEMEE R300 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.3/10 for Sigma RECO 80 LINK.
Which wins on “Battery life”?
Magicshine SEEMEE R300 wins on “Battery life”: 9.5/10 compared with 9/10 for Sigma RECO 80 LINK. Recorded values: 100 h versus 30 h.